![]() ![]() Voices, as the dialecticians say, don't signify naturally, but capriciously." įurthermore, fictional or experimental languages can be considered naturalistic if they model real world languages. François Rabelais's fictional giant Pantagruel, for instance, said: " It is a misuse of terms to say that we have natural language languages exist through arbitrary institutions and the conventions of peoples. Some speakers of Esperanto and Esperantidoj also avoid the term "artificial language" because they deny that there is anything "unnatural" about the use of their language in human communication.īy contrast, some philosophers have argued that all human languages are conventional or artificial. As with Interlingua, some prefer to describe its development as "planning" rather than "constructing". ![]() Similarly, Latino sine flexione (LsF) is a simplification of Latin from which the inflections have been removed. For example, few speakers of Interlingua consider their language artificial, since they assert that it has no invented content: Interlingua's vocabulary is taken from a small set of natural languages, and its grammar is based closely on these source languages, even including some degree of irregularity its proponents prefer to describe its vocabulary and grammar as standardized rather than artificial or constructed. The terms "planned", "constructed", and "artificial" are used differently in some traditions. The Russian census of 2010 found that there were in Russia about 992 speakers of Esperanto (on place 120) and nine of the Esperantido Ido. For example, the Hungarian census of 2011 found 8,397 speakers of Esperanto, and the census of 2001 found 10 of Romanid, two each of Interlingua and Ido and one each of Idiom Neutral and Mundolinco. The term glossopoeia is also used to mean language construction, particularly construction of artistic languages. Prescriptive grammars, which date to ancient times for classical languages such as Latin and Sanskrit, are rule-based codifications of natural languages, such codifications being a middle ground between naïve natural selection and development of language and its explicit construction. ![]() Outside Esperanto culture, the term language planning means the prescriptions given to a natural language to standardize it in this regard, even a "natural language" may be artificial in some respects, meaning some of its words have been crafted by conscious decision. Some prefer it to the adjective artificial, as this term may be perceived as pejorative. The expression planned language is sometimes used to indicate international auxiliary languages and other languages designed for actual use in human communication. Some people may also make constructed languages as a hobby. There are many possible reasons to create a constructed language, such as to ease human communication (see international auxiliary language and code) to give fiction or an associated constructed setting an added layer of realism for experimentation in the fields of linguistics, cognitive science, and machine learning for artistic creation and for language games. Planned languages (or engineered languages/engelangs) are languages that have been purposefully designed they are the result of deliberate, controlling intervention and are thus of a form of language planning. A constructed language may also be referred to as an artificial, planned or invented language, or (in some cases) a fictional language. Ī constructed language (shortened to a conlang) is a language whose phonology, grammar, and vocabulary, instead of having developed naturally, are consciously devised for some purpose, which may include being devised for a work of fiction. The Conlang Flag, a symbol of language construction created by subscribers to the CONLANG mailing list, which represents the Tower of Babel against a rising sun.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |